Non-compete clause
Also known as: Non-competition agreement, Restrictive covenant, Covenant not to compete
A non-compete clause is a contract provision that restricts an employee from joining a competitor or starting a competing business for a defined period after leaving the company. Enforceability varies sharply by jurisdiction — banned in California and several other US states, capped by EU member-state rules, and increasingly limited globally for low-wage workers.
Non-competes attempt to protect employer investments — in training, customer relationships, trade secrets — against the risk that a departing employee weaponizes them at a competitor. The trade-off is well documented: tighter restrictions reduce mobility, suppress wages, and concentrate market power. The 2020s have brought a wave of regulatory pushback, including a (currently paused) US FTC rule and EU member-state caps. Most modern enforceable non-competes are short (6–12 months), narrow (specific competitors or sectors), and limited to senior or specialist roles.
What a typical non-compete restricts
- Joining a named competitor or list of competitors
- Starting a competing business in the same sector
- Soliciting former colleagues (non-solicitation overlap)
- Approaching former customers (non-solicitation overlap)
- Using confidential information (overlaps with NDAs)
Enforceability — sharp jurisdictional variance
California, North Dakota, Oklahoma, and Minnesota effectively ban employee non-competes. The US FTC issued a 2024 rule banning most non-competes nationally; it was blocked by a federal court in August 2024 and remains on appeal. EU member states cap duration (typically 6–12 months) and often require post-employment compensation (e.g., Germany requires 50% of last salary during the restricted period). The UK reformed in 2024 to cap non-competes at 3 months. India and most of Latin America treat them as restraint-of-trade and largely unenforceable.
When non-competes actually work
Where enforceable, courts apply a reasonableness test: legitimate business interest, narrow scope (specific competitors, narrow geography), short duration, and consideration (extra pay or benefits). Broad blanket non-competes covering an entire industry rarely survive review. Senior executives, founders selling a business, and sales staff with active customer relationships are the strongest candidates; junior or technical staff at scale almost always fail the reasonableness test.
Frequently asked questions
- Are non-compete clauses enforceable?
- Enforceability varies sharply by jurisdiction. California and several other US states ban them. EU member states cap them (typically 6–12 months with compensation). The UK caps at 3 months as of 2024. Most modern courts require narrow scope, short duration, and a legitimate business interest.
- How long can a non-compete last?
- Where enforceable, 6–12 months is typical. Anything beyond 2 years is rarely upheld. The UK caps at 3 months. Some German non-competes run to 2 years but require 50% salary compensation during the restricted period.
- Are non-competes enforceable in Georgia?
- The Georgian Labor Code has no explicit framework. Courts apply general contract reasonableness tests — narrow, short, and tied to a legitimate business interest is more likely to survive than broad industry-wide restrictions.
- Non-compete vs non-solicitation — what's the difference?
- A non-compete restricts where you can work next. A non-solicitation restricts who you can approach (former colleagues, former customers). Non-solicitation clauses survive court challenges far more often than non-competes, so most modern contracts lead with non-solicitation.
- Should a small business use non-competes?
- Sparingly. Use them for senior executives, founders selling shares, or sales staff with active customer relationships. For technical or junior staff, rely on NDAs and offboarding processes instead — the enforcement risk and recruitment friction usually outweigh the protection.